Legal Opinion

Fjeldsted v. Ogden City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1933No. 5381PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLAND, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in this court. On petition of plaintiff, a taxpaying resident citizen of Ogden, Utah, suing for himself and on behalf of others similarly situated, an alternative writ of prohibition was issued wherein the defendants were directed to desist further proceedings with reference to the issuance and sale of certain bonds in the sum of $645,000' until the further order of this court, and to show cause why the writ should not be made permanent. The defendant Ogden City is a municipal corporation of Utah, a city of the second class, and the individual…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Shields v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  2. Barnes v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Overall v. City of MadisonvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  4. Zachary v. City of WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Garrett v. SwantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Public Institutional Building Authority v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Schmidt v. Village of KimberlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wadsworth v. Santaquin CityUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Utah Power & Light Co. v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Whipps v. Town of GreybullWyoming Supreme Court · 1941

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API