Legal Opinion

Berkshire v. Harem

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1946PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSSMAN, C. J. †

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment based upon a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $5,000 general damages and $2,500 punitive damages. The action was instituted by a complaint which charged that the appellant alienated from the respondent the affections of the latter’s wife.

The appellant presents thirteen assignments of error. Eleven challenge rulings which respectively 1) overruled the appellant’s motion for a nonsuit; 2) overruled objections made by the appellant to the reception of evidence concerning incidents that transpired after the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Johnson v. UnderwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Worth v. WorthWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Saxton v. BarberOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. McKinnon v. ChenowethOregon Supreme Court · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Buckles, Exec. v. Continental Cas. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Glass v. Stratoflex, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Patterson v. SkoglundOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Martin v. Arundel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  5. Brown v. VogtOregon Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API