Legal Opinion

Buckles, Exec. v. Continental Cas. Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1953PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is an action to recover money upon an insurance policy, brought by Mary E. Buckles, as plaintiff, against Continental Casualty Company, a corporation, as defendant. The case was tried to a jury. The parties stipulated that the jury might return a special verdict, and that the court should enter judgment according to such verdict. Three interrogatories were submitted to the jury, and its answers thereto were favorable to plaintiff. Based upon the verdict, the court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $2,500, with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Spain v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Johnson v. UnderwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Wintersteen v. SemlerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Kendall v. Travelers' Protective Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Botts v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. McCormick & Baxter Creosoting Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Finley v. Prudential Life & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Penrose v. Commercial Travelers Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. McCormick & Baxter Creosoting Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API