Legal Opinion
Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. Blocked Iron Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 9, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 23161PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
Day & Zimmerman, Inc., industrial engineers, brought this suit for a balance due it (fixed by the Court at $184,413.01) on a contract to design and construct a plant for Blocked Iron Corporation of America. BICOA counterclaimed for damages for defective performance. D&Z’s liability upon the counterclaim has been determined in a separate trial, testimony in the trial upon the issue of damages has been taken, and the case is now before the Court for disposition of that issue. The nature of the contract and the obligations of the parties under it are fully discussed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Hood v. MeiningerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. Blocked Iron Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Wyatt Industries, Inc. v. Publicker Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969