Legal Opinion
Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. Blocked Iron Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 22, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 23161PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
The plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the designing, engineering and construction of industrial plants of various kinds. The defendant in 1955 was the owner of a new and recently patented process, described as the “recrystallized limestone” process, for making blocked iron. Blocked iron consists of iron ore fines molded into cylindrical blocks for use in open hearth steel furnaces and hardened to prevent their breaking up when handled, transported and stockpiled.
On December 12,1955, the plaintiff and the defendant, who will be called “D&Z” and “BICOA”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- DeForest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Triangle Radio Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Cory v. Logan Coal & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Wheeling Stamping Company v. Birdsboro Steel Foundry & MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
3Cited by4 opinions
- M.C. Anderson v. GoldenDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1982
- Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. Blocked Iron Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- United States Ex Rel. Thayer v. Metro Construction Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971
- Wallingford Steel Co. v. Wire & Metal Specialties Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County1972