National Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People, Inc. (NAACP) v. Austin
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is a challenge to the Michigan Supreme Court’s 1992 legislative apportionment plan. The various plaintiffs maintain that the Court’s plan dilutes African-American voting strength in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973, by creating an insufficient number of majority-black state House and Senate districts. The plaintiffs also contend that the plan intentionally concentrates African-Americans into certain districts, in numbers beyond those required for an elector ally effective majority, in violation of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. With…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Pinnell v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- African American Voting Rights Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. VillaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Rural West Tennessee African-American Affairs Council, Inc. v. McWherterDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1995
- United States v. Euclid City School BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Anthony v. MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.