Legal Opinion

National Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People, Inc. (NAACP) v. Austin

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 14, 1994No. 2:92-cv-72696PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is a challenge to the Michigan Supreme Court’s 1992 legislative apportionment plan. The various plaintiffs maintain that the Court’s plan dilutes African-American voting strength in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973, by creating an insufficient number of majority-black state House and Senate districts. The plaintiffs also contend that the plan intentionally concentrates African-Americans into certain districts, in numbers beyond those required for an elector ally effective majority, in violation of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. With…

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pinnell v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. African American Voting Rights Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. VillaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Rural West Tennessee African-American Affairs Council, Inc. v. McWherterDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1995
  4. United States v. Euclid City School BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  5. Anthony v. MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API