Legal Opinion
Pinnell v. Board of County Commissioners
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 1999No. 18,831PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ARMIJO, Judge.
{1} This appeal presents a novel issue of federal constitutional law. Three Plaintiffs, each of whom resides in District Four of Santa Fe County, sought declaratory and permanent injunctive relief claiming a violation of their rights to equal protection as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. For its part, the Board, appellee in this action, claims that Plaintiffs’ action was dismissed below for failure to join an indispensable party and is further barred as moot.
{2} For the reasons stated below, we conclude that Plaintiffs’ claim was…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Meiboom v. WatsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Breen v. Carlsbad Municipal SchoolsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- Couch v. Astec Industries, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Robertson v. Carmel Builders Real EstateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hyden v. New Mexico Human Services DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.