Jeffreys v. Hancock
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Seventeenth District Court, Los Angeles County. Sepulveda, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court:
This action was brought to recover the sum of $710, claimed by the plaintiff to be due him from defendant for services rendered, and for board paid by him under a contract with the defendant. The case was tried by a jury, and a verdict was rendered for the sum of $683.
Two points were made on the appeal: First, that the verdict *647is not sustained by the evidence ; and, second, that the Court erred in striking out and excluding evidence under defendant’s cross-complaint.
In answer to the first point it is only necessary to say that there was sufficient evidence in support of plaintiff’s…
2Cited by10 opinions
- White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Clark v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Tuthill v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Commercial Credit Co. v. PeakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.