Legal Opinion
Khan v. Dunn-Edwards Corp.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided January 4, 2018No. B270382PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SORTINO, J.*
*92*806This lawsuit is brought pursuant to Labor Code section 2698, the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA). We affirm the summary judgment because plaintiff Hamid H. Khan failed to provide adequate notice of his claim to the relevant agency prior to bringing the lawsuit against his former employer Dunn-Edwards Corporation (Dunn-Edwards).
BACKGROUND
Khan worked at Dunn-Edwards from September 6, 1994, to September 2, 2011. During normal pay periods, all of Khan's wage statements included the pay period start date. Khan never looked at his wage statements. His…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Lopez v. Friant & Assocs., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Pyle, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
3Cited by16 opinions
- Esparza v. Safeway, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Mays v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Esparza v. Safeway, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Esparza v. Safeway, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Gunther v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.