Larkin v. Bontatibus
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
This is an appeal by all of the defendants, except the selectmen of the town of Branford, from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County declaring that a district organized for municipal purposes under the provisions of chapter 35 of the General Statutes, as amended, must comprise a single, self-contained area and may not comprise two or more noncontiguous areas, and also that Blaekstone Associates, a district organized by these defendants, is not a validly formed and lawful district.
Hotchkiss Grove is in the Pine Orchard West section of Branford, fronting on Blackstone Bay,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sigal v. WiseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Town of Enterprise v. State ex rel. Attorney-GeneralSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- Connecticut Savings Bank v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Hillman v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Town of OcontoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Gentile v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Kneip v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Stroiney v. Crescent Lake Tax DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Peterson v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.