Legal Opinion

United States v. Sacher

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 24, 1956No. Cr. No. 1216-55PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss an indictment charging him with contempt of Congress in that he unlawfully refused to answer certain pertinent questions propounded by a Congressional Committee, as set forth in the indictment. It is urged that failure to allege that the refusal was willful, deliberate or intentional is a vital defect in the indictment.

There is no doubt that as a matter of proof it is necessary to show at the trial that the refusal was not inadvertent; that it was intentional and willful, not in the sense that it was necessarily in bad…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. Henry Gregory Varlack, Samuel Kavalauskas and David Bernard Roche, and James Thomas Moock, Clifford Carter and Lawrence WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  3. Meyers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  4. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  5. United States v. LamontDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. O'BRIENDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API