United States v. Sacher
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss an indictment charging him with contempt of Congress in that he unlawfully refused to answer certain pertinent questions propounded by a Congressional Committee, as set forth in the indictment. It is urged that failure to allege that the refusal was willful, deliberate or intentional is a vital defect in the indictment.
There is no doubt that as a matter of proof it is necessary to show at the trial that the refusal was not inadvertent; that it was intentional and willful, not in the sense that it was necessarily in bad…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Henry Gregory Varlack, Samuel Kavalauskas and David Bernard Roche, and James Thomas Moock, Clifford Carter and Lawrence WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Meyers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- United States v. LamontDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. O'BRIENDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965