Legal Opinion

Corona's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 6, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas dismissing its appeal from a decision of the defendant zoning board of appeals.

The plaintiff owns slightly over eighteen acres of land which is in an industrial zone in what is popularly called the south meadows area of Hartford. The operation of an automobile junk yard is permitted in an industrial zone under the Hartford zoning regulations, and about fifteen acres of the land are being used for such purpose at the present time. Pursuant to § 21-16 of the General Statutes (Rev. 1958), the plaintiff applied to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KievmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Levinsky v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. Ferndale Dairy, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  4. Rosenberg v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Petrillo v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Yale Auto Parts, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Yale Auto Parts, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Aunt Hack Ridge Estates, Inc. v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  4. Yale Auto Parts, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
  5. McKnight v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API