Legal Opinion

Trilling v. NIPPERSING MANAGEMENT CORP.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1972No. 17PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

An examination of the record reflects that on or about January 5, 1956, Nipper-sink Manor Resort executed certain promissory notes payable to the plaintiffs. It is alleged that Nippersink Manor Resort subsequently merged with the defendant corporation.

In our view, the significance placed upon two documents is dispositive of the material issues raised on this appeal. The first is identified as Exhibit “C,” dated July 29,1966, and reads as follows:. This letter will confirm our agreement for the liquidation of the $%500.00 balance due you on the following 2,537.50 membership deposits:

Charles…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Paschong v. HollenbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Illinois Steel Co. v. WarrasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wagner v. Springaire Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Schmidt v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Cruis Along Boats, Inc. v. Standard Steel Products Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hansher v. KaishianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Knapke v. Grain Dealers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API