Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Schmidt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1968No. 38PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The husband on this appeal does not challenge the finding of cruel and inhuman treatment nor the award of the divorce to the wife. He contends that the provisions for division of estate, alimony, support money, attorneys’ fees and the minor’s clothing bill should be set aside.

During the various stages of the litigation and until the judgment was entered in the trial court the husband was represented in all or some phases of the proceedings by three attorneys — Mr. Eichard D. Kaestner, Mr. Eo-land Steinle, Jr., and Mr. Eobert Beaudry. A fourth attorney represented him on a motion to review the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Co. v. WarrasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Radandt v. RadandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Estate of BoydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Pasternak v. PasternakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Czap v. CzapWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lacey v. LaceyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp. v. Royal Electric Manufacturing Company, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Wilharms v. WilharmsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Conrad v. ConradWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Schmitz v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API