Legal Opinion
People v. Maugh
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 19, 1969No. Crim. 16056PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, J.
Charged with a violation of section 288, Penal Code, and incest, the charges were reduced to, and defendant was found guilty of annoying and molesting a child under the age of 18 (§ 647a, subd. (1), Pen. Code), a misdemeanor. On April 15, 1968, defendant was certified by the municipal court to the superior court for hearing to determine if he is a mentally disordered sex offender. On April 18, 1968, the superior court appointed Doctors Mace and Vogeler to examine defendant. A hearing was had on April 30, 1968, reports of the two examining psychiatrists were admitted in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. SuccopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. TownsendCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Sussli v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. RainvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.