Legal Opinion

Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority v. Dayton Human Relations Council

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1992No. 13106PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Presiding Judge.

Defendants-appellants, Dayton Human Relations Council (“HRC”) and Jerald L. Steed, Executive Director of HRC, appeal from the trial court’s decision granting to the plaintiff-appellee, Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority (“DMHA”), a permanent injunction against HRC. HRC was prohibited from proceeding with a hearing on charges of discriminatory practices against DMHA made by a DMHA employee, Howard Adams, to HRC.

HRC contends that the trial court erred by exercising jurisdiction in the action because: (1) DMHA failed to join all parties who had an interest in the matter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Republic Steel Corp. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Natalina Food Co. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. East Manufacturing Corp. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Zavakos v. Zavakos Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Harbor Park Marinas, Inc. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Columbus v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Dimension Serv. Corp. v. First Colonial Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State Ex Rel. Scott v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. MWL Ents., L.L.C. v. Mid-Miami Invest. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API