Fridline v. Integrity Vehicle Group, Inc
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ZACH FRIDLINE, on behalf of No. 4:23-CV-01194 himself and others similarly situated, (Chief Judge Brann) Plaintiff, v. INTEGRITY VEHICLE GROUP, INC. and NATCAP, INC. d/b/a VANGUARD VEHICLE ARMOR, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION OCTOBER 31, 2023 I. BACKGROUND In September 2023, Plaintiff Zachary Fridline filed a two-count amended complaint against Defendants, Natcap, Inc., doing business as Vanguard Vehicle Armor (“Vanguard”), and Integrity Vehicle Group, Inc. (“Integrity”). On September 18, 2023, Integrity filed a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Meyer v. HolleySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.