Legal Opinion

Fridline v. Integrity Vehicle Group, Inc

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 2023No. 4:23-cv-01194Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ZACH FRIDLINE, on behalf of No. 4:23-CV-01194 himself and others similarly situated, (Chief Judge Brann) Plaintiff, v. INTEGRITY VEHICLE GROUP, INC. and NATCAP, INC. d/b/a VANGUARD VEHICLE ARMOR, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION OCTOBER 31, 2023 I. BACKGROUND In September 2023, Plaintiff Zachary Fridline filed a two-count amended complaint against Defendants, Natcap, Inc., doing business as Vanguard Vehicle Armor (“Vanguard”), and Integrity Vehicle Group, Inc. (“Integrity”). On September 18, 2023, Integrity filed a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  4. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Meyer v. HolleySupreme Court of the United States · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API