Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg
Is an unaccepted offer to satisfy the named plaintiff's individual claim sufficient to render a case moot when the complaint seeks relief on behalf of the plaintiff and a class of persons similarly situated? This question, on which Courts of Appeals have divided, was reserved in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk, 569 U.S. ----, ----, ----, n. 4, 133 S.Ct. 1523, 1528, 1529, n. 4, 185 L.Ed.2d 636 (2013). We hold today, in accord with Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that an unaccepted settlement offer has no force. Like other unaccepted contract offers, it creates no lasting…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by961 opinions
- Grant Fritsch v. Swift Transportation Co. of AzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Uzuegbunam v. PreczewskiSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Facebook, Inc. v. DuguidSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Brown v. BuhmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
956 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.