Legal Opinion

Pyco Supply Co. v. American Centennial Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1988No. 223A87PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

The issue presented on this appeal is whether the Court of Appeals erred when it reversed the decision of the trial court that allowed plaintiff to amend its complaint and have the amended complaint relate back to the filing of its original complaint. The underlying issue then is whether the original complaint in this action gave “notice of the transactions, occurrences, or series of transactions or occurrences” which formed the basis for the amended complaint within the meaning of Rules 8(a)(1) and 15(c) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. We answer both questions…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Trustees of Rowan Technical College v. J. Hyatt Hammond Associates Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Henry v. DeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Embree Construction Group, Inc. v. Rafcor, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Mangum v. Raleigh Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Mullis v. SechrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Wake County v. Hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. The NC State Bar v. MerrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API