Wake County v. Hotels.com, L.P.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
Where the trial court did not err in concluding that defendants are not subject to plaintiffs’ occupancy tax and where the trial court did not err in concluding that defendants were not required to collect and remit an occupancy tax, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants. Where the trial court dismissed plaintiffs’ claim seeking recovery for collected but not remitted taxes on the basis of a contractual obligation because of plaintiffs’ failure to provide sufficient notice of the claim in their pleadings, we affirm the dismissal. Lastly,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. Salem Logistics Traffic Services, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- Moore v. City of HarrimanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Calloway v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Diaz v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Wells Fargo Ins. Servs. United States, Inc. v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- The NC State Bar v. MerrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Murphy v. HintonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Regency Ctrs. Acquisition, LLC v. Crescent Acquisitions, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2018
- Adum v. Albemarle Plantation Prop. Owners Ass'nNorth Carolina Business Court · 2021
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.