Legal Opinion

Castillo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 6, 1991No. 1411-89, 1412-89PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANTS’ PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellants, Ralph Castillo and Christopher Castillo, were tried jointly and found guilty of the offense of engaging in organized criminal activity. Tex.Penal Code § 71.02(a)(5). The jury assessed punishment for each at imprisonment for 65 years and a fine of $100,000. The Tenth Court of Appeals subsequently affirmed both convictions in an unpublished opinion. Castillo v. State, Nos. 10-88-044-CR and 10-88-034-CR (Tex.App.— Waco, Aug. 10, 1991). We granted Appellants’ petitions for discretionary review, pursuant to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Hennessy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. State v. Cuong Phu LeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. McClintock, Bradley RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  4. Farinella v. CroftSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  5. Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API