Legal Opinion
McClintock, Bradley Ray
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 1, 2014No. PD-0925-13PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · PricePrice, J.
Having concluded that a Fourth Amendment violation occurred in this cause, the First Court of Appeals held that the trial court should have granted the appellant’s motion to suppress. The State now contends that the court of appeals should not have reversed the appellant’s conviction without first deciding whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applied. 1 We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review in order to examine whether the court of appeals erred in that respect and also to determine whether the court of appeals erred in one of the questions it did…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. CullenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by69 opinions
- State v. Cuong Phu LeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Martinez, Roger AnthonyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2019
- State v. ZunigaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Hyland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2019
- Niles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.