Legal Opinion

Hennessy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 12, 1983No. 63270PublishedCited by 156 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOM G. DAVIS, Judge.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for possession of a controlled substance, namely hydromorphone. The jury assessed punishment at seven years, probated. 1

On February 16, 1978, Officer Earl Mu-sick of the Houston Police Department received a tip from an informant that he and two other men planned to rob “an unknown Doctor of Dilaudid [hydromorphone] tablets which he sold from his residence.” The next day, February 17, the police followed the informant and two other men to the street in front of appellant’s residence and arrested the three men as they were getting out…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by156 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Angelo R. Carrillo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
  4. Bower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. McVickers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API