Legal Opinion

State v. Bay

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1998No. Nos. C-980084, C-980085PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Judge.

Defendant-appellant James M. Bay appeals from his convictions for disorderly conduct on the public sidewalk in front of a bar and for resisting arrest fifteen to thirty minutes later. 1 He contends that because his arrest for disorderly conduct was complete once he was in custody outside the bar, he could not be convicted for resisting that arrest outside the Hamilton County Justice Center. We disagree.

The events at issue began when Bay became intoxicated at a bar located on Pete Rose Way in Cincinnati. He admitted consuming eight beers and five shots of hard liquor. After…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. DarrahOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. KeeganOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. Perdue v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
  3. State v. TuricOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. BarnesOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API