State v. Barker
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOWNIE, Judge.
¶ 1 William Charles Barker appeals his conviction for resisting arrest. We affirm the conviction and hold that a police officer need not announce that a person is under arrest in order to “effect an arrest” within the meaning of Arizona’s resisting arrest statute.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1
¶ 2 Officer Miller came upon Barker and a woman arguing loudly in the roadway. Barker told Officer Miller he got into an argument with the woman and threw a pair of sunglasses at her. Officer Miller detected alcohol on Barker’s breath. The officer believed he had probable cause to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- United States v. Irving Jones, Michael Burnett, Howard Krantz and Steven BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Neal Andrew Peters v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2020