Legal Opinion

State v. Keegan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1990No. Nos. C-890236 to C-890239PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants-appellants, Joseph Keegan, Warren Smith and Marlene Avey, appeal their convictions in a jury trial for criminal trespass. Smith also appeals his conviction for resisting arrest. In their three assignments of error, defendants contend that the trial court erred: (1) in denying their motions to quash based upon lack of jurisdiction, (2) in granting the state’s motion in limine, and (3) in overruling their motions for a judgment of acquittal under Crim.R. 29. These assignments of error are not well taken.

Defendants entered a fenced area of the Planned Parenthood Clinic which was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. GrubbOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. City of Athens v. BromallOhio Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ronnie Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Logsdon v. HainsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. State v. BayOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. BarkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. MoralesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API