Legal Opinion
O'Rear v. Conway
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 16, 1955No. 6 Div. 590PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a boundary line dispute between appellant as complainant and appellees as respondents. There was a decree adopting the contention of respondents. Complainant has appealed.
The bill as amended alleges that complainant owns the SE 54 of SW 54 of Section 33, Township 11, Range 12, and the NW 54 of SE 54 °f said section in Marion County; that appellee G. E. Conway owns the land in NE 54 of SE 54 of said section; James L. Hullet and Jesse Conway own the land in SW 54 of SE 54 °f said section, known as the Woodham forty; and that the dividing line between them, respectively, is disputed.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alford v. RodgersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Ford v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Billingsley v. BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Spires v. NixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Wilson v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ryan v. FulfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- White v. BerreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- W. T. Smith Lumber Company v. BryanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Darden v. GrimesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Williams v. Laubenthal Land & Timber Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006