Legal Opinion

Ford v. Bradford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1925No. 7 Div. 551PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotfldin, J.

The suit is to recover for trees alleged to have been cut on plaintiff’s land. The original complaint contained three counts': One for the statutory penalty for cutting trees, one in trespass, and one in trover. The case was here on former appeal. See Ford v. Bradford, 210 Ala. 48, 97 So. 55.

After the cause was remanded, common counts were added. In the latter trial all these counts were submitted to the jury except the count for money had and received, which was charged out by the court. There was plea of the general issue as to all counts, and a special plea to the first three counts, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. BachusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Cooper v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Billingsley v. BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  4. Chambless v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Ford v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Yauger v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Ivory v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Lee v. GidleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Shepherd v. Scott's ChapelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API