Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Fulford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 12, 1962No. 1 Div. 15, 16PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

These two cases were consolidated for trial and on appeal, since they involve the same issues of fact and law. Separate but identical decrees were rendered in favor of appellees (respondents). From these decrees complainants have appealed.

Complainants (appellants) filed separate bills of complaint to establish a boundary line between the lands of the appellants and the lands of the appellees. Appellants alleged that the boundary line between their land and the land of the appellees was the middle or division line of the LaCoste Grant, Section 6, Township 9 South, Range 3 East…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashurst v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Stansell v. TharpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Nolin v. ParmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  4. Guice v. BarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. Edwards v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deese v. OdomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Ratliff v. GiorlandoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Hiser v. HulseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Daffron v. HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Johnson v. DickersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API