Legal Opinion

Catlin v. Mills

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1926No. 19846. Department TwoPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

— On November 7, 1899, James L. Mills and Marie L. Mills, husband and wife, executed a note due November 7, 1904, -for the sum of $3,500, payable to Phoebe J. Catlin, with interest at ten per cent payable annually. To secure this note, a mortgage was made by the husband and wife on their community property, and the debt wás a community obligation. On February 22, 1922, Marie L. Mills died, and James L. Mills died on March 24, 1924. The respondent, John Catlin, became the owner and holder of the note and mortgage, and in July, 1925, began this suit to recover the balance due on the note and to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schramm v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Stubblefield v. McAuliffWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Dephillips v. NeslinWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Childs v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. San Poil Consolidated Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Matson v. WeidenkopfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. In Re Coffey's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Wyoming Building & Loan Ass'n v. Mills Const. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hanley v. MostWashington Supreme Court · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API