Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Homer Ore Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1944No. Docket No. 4, Calendar No. 42,622PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

Plaintiffs sue for unauthorized mining, removal and sale of 52,000 tons of iron ore from a 60-acre tract in Iron county known as the Minckler mine, in which plaintiffs have an undivided 1/24 interest.

On January 15, 1913, Minckler, the owner of the tract, made a lease to Woodworth for a term of 50 years, with unconditional right of termination -on 60-days’ notice. The tract had not then been mined. Plaintiffs acquired their interest December 4, 1936, expressly subject to the lease.

Defendant acquired all of the lessee interest besides 1/6 of the fee, and thereafter made an agreement with all…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Silver King Coalition Mines Co. of Nevada v. Silver King Consol. Mining Co. of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  2. Fiquet v. AllisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Maday v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. De Grasse v. Verona Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Cecil v. ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. SmythTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. White v. SmythCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Hanna Iron Ore Co. v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. White v. SmythTexas Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API