Legal Opinion

(PC) Turner v. Zepp

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 5, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00184Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 VINCENT TURNER, Case No. 1:20-cv-00184-AWI-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER FOR DEFENDANT KHALED A. 12 TAWANSY TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HE v. SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR 13 FAILURE TO APPEAR AND FAILURE TO ANDREW ZEPP, et al., COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS 14 Defendants. 15 TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff Vincent Turner (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 On June 23, 2020, the Court issued a screening order…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Adriana International Corp. v. ThoerenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Dreith v. Nu Image, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API