(PC) Pena v. Juarez
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL ANTHONY PENA, No. 1:23-cv-01400-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF 13 v. PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW BANE ACT CLAIM 14 J. JUAREZ, et al., (ECF No. 11) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed December 4, 2023. 20 (ECF No. 11.) 21 I. 22 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 23 The Court is required to screen complaints…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.