Michael E. v. State

Nebraska Advance Sheets 532 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS CONCLUSION Baker’s motions for postconviction relief in these two cases do not allege facts which constitute a denial of his constitu- tional rights, and, as to certain allegations, the record refutes his claims. Therefore, the district court did not err when it denied Baker’s motion for postconviction relief in each case without an evidentiary hearing. Affirmed. Michael E., individually and as Guardian and next friend on behalf of his minor child, Avalyn J., appellant, v. State of Nebraska et al., appellees. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed September 6,…