Potter v. Board of Regents

Nebraska Advance Sheets 732 287 NEBRASKA REPORTS maximize speed and efficiency of distributions while minimiz- ing expenses. Thus, the court today correctly declines the appellant’s invi- tation to expand its review under the waiver rule to evidence outside of the divorce decree and the associated property settlement agreement. But a better approach is available, and I commend it to the Legislature. Paul D. Potter, appellant, v. Board of R egents of the University of Nebraska et al., appellees. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed March 21, 2014. No. S-13-544. 1. Summary Judgment: Appeal and Error. An…