Legal Opinion
Anthony Natale and Julia Natale, His Wife v. The Upjohn Company and Lakeside Laboratories, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 15, 1966No. 15198PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the District Court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ diversity action on the ground that it was barred by the Delaware Statute of Limitations which provides that actions for personal injuries, whether in contract or tort, must be brought within two years. 1
The action was brought in the District Court of Delaware April 29, 1964 — four years after the alleged cause of action accrued. The Complaint alleged that on April 29, 1960, there had been administered to the wife plaintiff in the course. of her treatment, in a Pennsylvania hospital, for depressive…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Rosenzweig v. HellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Gardiner v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Echon v. Pennsylyania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Davidson Lumber Sales, Inc. v. Bonneville Investment, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Johnson v. Hockessin Tractor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Barbara J. Reid v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Hood v. McConemyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
- Fashion Novelty Corp. of New Jersey v. Cocker MacHine & Foundry Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.