Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. District Council 33

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1991No. 160 E.D. Appeal Docket 1988PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 1991, the Application for Reconsideration is granted. Matter to be resubmitted on briefs.

OPINION OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

This is an appeal from an en banc order of the Commonwealth Court affirming the grant of a preliminary injunction by the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. Appellees District Council 33 of AFSCME, et al. (Union), instituted the underlying action seeking to enjoin appellants City of Philadelphia, et al. (City), from enforcing Philadelphia Ordinance 1107, which would have put Municipal Retirement System Benefit Plan…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hollinger v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Mazzie v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Herman v. DixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Valley Forge Historical Society v. Washington Memorial ChapelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. McMullan v. WOHLGEMUTHSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by33 opinions

  1. Summit Towne Centre, Inc. v. Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Borough of Pottstown v. Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. School District v. Wilkinsburg Education Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Gaeta v. Ridley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. City of Butler v. City of Butler Police DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API