Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Henning

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1921No. L. A. No. 6801PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying probate to a letter written by the deceased dated May 15, 1920, to his brother, the petitioner for its probate. Like most letters, it is entirely written, signed, and dated in the handwriting of the deceased. The letter is too long to quote. The writer states that he is coming east for the purpose of getting married. He expected to leave Los Angeles on July 3d, to arrive at Thurmont, Maryland, July 8th, and be married July 15th, if the girl he had picked out would have him. The writer discusses his own love affair and that of Hazel, who was willing to…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. PagelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Estate of GolderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Estate of SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Carolene Sales Co. v. Canyon Milk Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Johnson v. VealeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API