Legal Opinion

Carolene Sales Co. v. Canyon Milk Products Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1922No. 17111PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

—Appellant acquired the right to use the trade-mark “Carolene” for a canned product of skimmed milk and cocoanut oil, and on April 1, 1920, entered into a contract with respondent Canyon Milk *221Products Company for its manufacture. By its terms, the contract was to run for three years from its date. The seller was required to supply so much of its product as the purchaser might desire up to the capacity of the plant. The price was made to depend upon the wholesale price of a similar product known as “Hebe”, and the contract contained a provision that, if the cost of manufacture exceeded the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Webster v. BeauWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. States v. DurkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Andreopulos v. PeresteredesWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Cannon v. Oregon Moline Plow Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. In Re Estate of HenningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atomic Fuel Extraction Corporation v. Slick's EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Lloyd v. American Can Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Jenkins v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API