Legal Opinion

Oaks v. Kendall

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1937No. Civ. 5589PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A rehearing was granted in this case to further consider the question as to whether a conditional judgment which was previously rendered in an ejectment suit between these plaintiffs, Gr. E. Oaks and wife, as vendors of the real property involved in this action, and Thomas R. Kendall and wife, defendants herein, as conditional vendees of that property, estops the vendors from now asserting title to the property free from a subsequent asserted judgment lien thereon in favor of Evelyn Erwin, who was a stranger to the original transaction and suit. On rehearing it is strenuously…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Avery v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Belieu v. PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. People ex rel. Ford v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Allen v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Schut v. DoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Cannefax v. ClementCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. Barr Lumber Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Fulton v. DuroIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API