Cannefax v. Clement
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Judge:
Raymond and Debra Cannefax (“Canne-faxes”) appeal a summary judgment entered against them in their quiet title action and in favor of Donald and Ruth Clement (“Clements”). In granting summary judgment, the court held that a seller’s retained legal title to real property under an exec-utory land sale contract was “real property” and, therefore, that a judgment docketed by the Clements, the seller’s creditors, was a lien against the property pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 78-22-1 (1987). We reverse.
George W. Barker, Jr. and Lila M. Barker (“Barkers”) were fee simple owners…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Marks v. City of TucumcariNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Mueller v. Novelty Dye WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Heider v. DietzOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- First Security Bank of Idaho, Nat. Ass'n v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thurston v. Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Cannefax v. ClementUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Sleeping Indian Ranch, Inc. v. West Ridge Group, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Bruce J. McDermott and Betty McDermott v. Zions First National Bank, N.A., United States of America, by and Through Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.