Legal Opinion

Cannefax v. Clement

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 2, 1990No. 890292-CAPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Raymond and Debra Cannefax (“Canne-faxes”) appeal a summary judgment entered against them in their quiet title action and in favor of Donald and Ruth Clement (“Clements”). In granting summary judgment, the court held that a seller’s retained legal title to real property under an exec-utory land sale contract was “real property” and, therefore, that a judgment docketed by the Clements, the seller’s creditors, was a lien against the property pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 78-22-1 (1987). We reverse.

George W. Barker, Jr. and Lila M. Barker (“Barkers”) were fee simple owners…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Marks v. City of TucumcariNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Mueller v. Novelty Dye WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Heider v. DietzOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. First Security Bank of Idaho, Nat. Ass'n v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thurston v. Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. Cannefax v. ClementUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Sleeping Indian Ranch, Inc. v. West Ridge Group, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. Bruce J. McDermott and Betty McDermott v. Zions First National Bank, N.A., United States of America, by and Through Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API