Legal Opinion

Belling v. Croter

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1943No. Civ. 12166PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is a suit brought by plaintiff against defendant to establish the existence of a partnership, which defendant denied, and for an accounting of its profits. The trial court found from the evidence that the plaintiff had not come into court with clean hands, and upon this ground denied him the equitable relief sought. It is the contention of plaintiff, appellant herein, that the maxim, he who comes into equity must come with clean hands, was erroneously applied.

Appellant contends generally on this appeal that whatever blame attaches to his conduct in the transaction between the parties,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bacon v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Watson v. PooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Colby v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Tognazzi v. WilhelmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crosstalk Productions, Inc. v. JacobsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Stone v. LobsienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Katz v. KarlssonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Rosenfeld v. ZimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API