Legal Opinion
Kaltsas v. Duralite Co.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided November 23, 1976PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHale, C.J.
On February 10, 1970, James Kaltsas and Paul Kaltsas instituted separate actions against PrestWheel, Inc. (Prest-Wheel), seeking damages for breaches of employment contracts. During the pendency of this liti*635gation, Prest-Wheel merged with a corporation known as Duralite Company, Inc. (Duralite), and Duralite was substituted as defendant in each case. The actions were consolidated for trial and referred to an auditor,2 whose findings of fact were not to be final. The auditor filed a report reciting findings of breaches by the defendant and damages in the amount of $99,263.89 in favor of Paul…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Maynard v. Royal Worcester Corset Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Scannell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- McKenna v. Commissioner of Mental HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Taylor v. CreeleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Smith v. PallayOregon Supreme Court · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Prozinski v. Northeast Real Estate Services, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- National Medical Care, Inc. v. ZigelbaumMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Narkin v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- Olson v. ElaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Dickson v. Riverside Iron Works, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.