Maynard v. Royal Worcester Corset Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract for salary alleged to be due to the plaintiff from the defendant, the first count being for $961.50, alleged to be due for the period from September 21, 1907, to and including November 30, 1907; and the second for $416.66, for a period from December 1, 1907, to and including December 31, 1907. Writ in the Superior Court for the county of Worcester dated February 8, 1908. There was a trial before G-asTcill, J., without a jury, who found for the plaintiff in the sum…
Read the full summary
Contract for salary alleged to be due to the plaintiff from the defendant, the first count being for $961.50, alleged to be due for the period from September 21, 1907, to and including November 30, 1907; and the second for $416.66, for a period from December 1, 1907, to and including December 31, 1907. Writ in the Superior Court for the county of Worcester dated February 8, 1908. There was a trial before G-asTcill, J., without a jury, who found for the plaintiff in the sum of $685; and the defendant alleged exceptions. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was submitted on briefs.
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, J.
This is an action of contract, by which the plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant money claimed to be *3due on account of salary. There are two counts in his declaration, the first alleging salary due, under a contract for one year, to December 1, 1907, and the second that due under a separate contract for the month of December. The case was heard before a judge of the Superior Court, who found for the plaintiff in a sum less than the salary. The defendant’s exceptions bring before us the questions whether all the evidence warranted a finding that there were contracts for stipulated…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Martin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- C. W. Hunt Co. v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Cutter v. GilletteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Porter & McMillan v. Burkett, Murphy & BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Hamilton v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Jackson v. Action for Boston Community Development, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Frati v. JanniniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Hall v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.