Legal Opinion

Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Munson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1921No. 16038PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yaldma county, Taylor, J., entered June 9, 1919, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for unlawful detainer.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

Prior to the year 1916, the respondent, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California, became the owner, through a sale under a mortgage foreclosure, of certain orchard lands situated in Yakima county. After acquiring the land, the company employed one R. W. Herod to care for and manage the property pending a sale of the land, informing him that it was not its purpose to hold the land for a longer period than it was necessary so to do, as it was not “in the real-estate business.” While acting as manager of the property, Herod found contemplative purchasers in the persons of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carstens v. McReavyWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Samson v. BealeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Armstrong v. OakleyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Meyer v. BeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Foss Investment Co. v. AterWashington Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kosten v. FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lee v. EstabrookWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. PEOPLES NAT. BK. OF WASH. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Stenson v. ThrushWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API