Legal Opinion
Teamsters Local Union 1714 v. Public Employee Relations Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 22, 1990No. 89-317, 89-338PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Both the governing statute and implementing regulations require that a decision on proposed disciplinary action against career District of Columbia employees be rendered within forty-five days of notice of such proposed action. This appeal involves the question of the effect of a failure to comply with this time provision. We remand the case for the Public Employee Relations Board to further consider and amplify its reasoning with respect to this question.
I
On March 8, 1986, Jean Harrod, a correctional officer at the District of Columbia Department of Corrections (the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Montalvo-MurilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- West Virginia Human Rights Commission v. GarretsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Berkley v. D.C. Transit, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Holzsager v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Georgetown University v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Cooper v. AFSCME, LOCAL 1033District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.