Legal Opinion

Hagerman v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 12, 1955No. 44557PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHLING, C.

[624] Lewis B. Hagerman and Herman Sparber, licensed auctioneers of the city of St. Louis, instituted this action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief to test the constitutionality of St. Louis ordinance provisions regulating the “retail auction sales of jewelry, watches, clocks or silverware.” The trial court held the provisions unconstitutional and void. The plaintiffs pleaded that the questioned ordinance provisions contravene § 40(30), Art. Ill, Mo. Const. 1945, prohibiting special laws (the section applies to city ordinances — McKaig v. Kansas City, 363 Mo. 1033,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Adams v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. People Ex Rel. Schwab v. . GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. City of Springfield v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. State Ex Inf. Atty. Gen. v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  5. People v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Borden Company v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Steinberg-Baum & Co. v. Dayton CountrymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  3. ABC Liquidators, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Wilson v. City of WaynesvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Blauvelt v. BeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API