Legal Opinion

In Re Gough

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1932No. Docket No. 1662PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

This is an appeal by the people of the state of California from an order granting* a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and the discharge of the petitioner. The petitioner makes a preliminary objection in the form of a motion to dismiss the appeal.

The application for a writ of habeas corpus was presented to the superior court of this state in and for the county of Marin. The petitioner was represented by his attorney Mr. Califro. The people of the state of California were represented by Mr. Greer, the district attorney of Marin County. The people were the only respondents and Mr. Greer did…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re SichofskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In Re ForbesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API