Legal Opinion
In Re Forbes
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1930No. Docket No. 1139PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The petition for a writ of habeas corpus herein, in behalf of Sidney E. Forbes, represents to the court that the said Sidney E. Forbes is now illegally detained in the state prison at Folsom by the warden of said prison.
Without following the recitals of the different paragraphs of the petition, the facts may be summarized as follows: On the sixth day of May, 1926, Sidney E. Forbes was received at the state prison, having been sentenced for the crime of burglary. On the second day of July, 1927, the term of imprisonment of said Forbes was fixed at five years. On the seventeenth day…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Woodward v. MurdockIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- In Re CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- McMahon v. SankeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Ex Parte McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Ex Parte RiceCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
3Cited by10 opinions
- O'MALLEY v. HiattDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- In Re PattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- William H. Flint v. Carl Hocker, Warden, Nevada State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- In Re DanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- In Re GoughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.