Legal Opinion

Daley v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 2009No. 2763 EDA 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Herbert L. Daley and Evelyn Daley, h/w, (collectively “Appellant”) ask us to determine whether the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment in favor of Appellees, A.W. Chesterton Inc., U.S. Supply Company, and Duro-Dyne Corporation, and dismissed Appellant’s complaint with prejudice, based on the court’s interpretation of Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., 417 Pa.Super. 440, 612 A.2d 1021, 1028 (1992) (en banc). We hold the trial court misapplied the law in granting summary judgment in favor of Appel-lees based on the court’s unduly restrictive…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Simmons v. Pacor, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Devine v. HuttSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daley v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Thompson v. GinkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Linster v. Allied Signal, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Daley v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. FordCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API